"The bizarre situation is, because we’ve got so many people around who haven’t lived through these previous cycles, they prefer to have the bullion. And they are prepared not to take the free thing that’s offered to you, which is a free 20-year call on the gold price when you invest in a good gold mine. It’s something you get to see very rarely in your lifetime, and yet people are choosing to pass it by.” --Strategist Don Coxe in a Kingworld News interview, 5/22/12
Dear All,
This is truly Kafkaesque. In order to obfuscate reality and shaft taxpayers, unions and politicians are refusing to admit the dimension of the looming disaster. In a near-zero interest rate environment in which funds are struggling to make any returns at all, officials are bickering over lowering annual return assumptions from an absurd 8% to a ridiculous 7%. Either assumption results in avoiding the admission that the present values of these funds are negative. As you read the following, ask yourself what differs here from the refusal of the Greek populace to accept austerity? NYTimes: Public Pensions Faulted for Bets on Rosy Returns
The following is not resolvable. The pervasive presence of derivatives among money-center banks is a hall of mirrors magnifying the ills of an over-leveraged financial system to such a degree that the only way to soften the havoc of interconnection is through dollar debasement. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that not surprisingly, the derivative clearinghouses themselves have been declared too big to fail.
Matt Taibbi's latest on the underworld: Rollingstone: Accidentally Released - and Incredibly Embarrassing - Documents Show How Goldman et al Engaged in 'Naked Short Selling'
Barack Obama is reportedly the country's first crack president. John Aziz comments: azizonomics: President Choomwagon
Misc...
* La de da..Just another working day at a TBTF bank: WND EXCLUSIVE: Banking giant HSBC 'a criminal enterprise'...Whistleblower makes damning case in video interview
* Alan Greenspan Asked for Advice, Do People Ever Learn?
* It's worth reviewing this compilation of the Fed chief's forecasting ineptitude over the past several years: The Best of Ben
* Alan Greenspan Asked for Advice, Do People Ever Learn?
* It's worth reviewing this compilation of the Fed chief's forecasting ineptitude over the past several years: The Best of Ben
* Cryosat is the European Space Agency's orbital observer of the polar ice caps: Arctic Ice Thickness (6.5 feet) has not changed since 1940
* Our current central planners' curricula vitarum...On average, during the 20th century and thus far in the 21st, 44% of U.S. presidential cabinet members worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment. In the Obama administration it's 8%. The previous record low over 19 administrations was 30% (Teddy Roosevelt's in 1901).
The trend...
FT: Japanese pension fund switches to gold
Reuters: Turkish gold sales to Iran soar as sanctions bite
Yomiuri: Direct yen-yuan forex deal to start in June
Azizonomics: Is China Really Liquidating Treasuries?
Since this blog's inception it has emphasized the central dilemma of the financial system -- OTC derivatives -- as in this 2009 post; Yersina pestis. The only thing surprising about JPMorgan's announcement of its derivative losses is that there was an announcement at all. Something significant has changed. As stated here on numerous occasions, the FASB has blessed the fictitious valuation of the derivative positions of JPMorgan Chase and the four other largest U.S. banks -- all of which, along with Deutsche Bank, are insolvent. The following was posted here in January 2011 (At year-end JPM and the five largest bank holding companies reported $71 trillion and $290 trillion respectively in notional derivative value on their books:
J.P.Morgan Chase reported "better than expected" earnings on Friday. The fact that the bank is the largest financial cesspool in history with $77.7 trillion in notional derivative value on its books (against $176 billion in shareholder equity -- a ratio of 441:1) that renders the company an insolvent zombie seems not to matter to most analysts -- and why should it? JPM has Too-Big-to-Care status. The Federal Reserve will backstop JPM's negative capital in perpetuity courtesy of US dollar holders. For JPMorgan Chase is no longer a privately functioning enterprise but rather a government entity masquerading as such. Since the financial crisis commenced the needle has barely budged on the exposure that JPM assigns to itself from its toxic derivative book, despite the fact that the financial world which it insures through that book has largely collapsed. Were JPM to increase its stated exposure by just one quarter of one percent of its derivative book's notional value it would more than wipe out the entirety of its shareholders' equity. Not to worry, not to care -- JPM's investment bankers are to receive an average payout of $369,651 for 2010 and the company said it is hoarding enough operating capital to soon increase its dividend. The U.S. Federal Reserve has effectively announced that JPM's balance sheet has no material relevance. Whatever is bad the Fed will eat -- whatever operating cash JPM can generate is free for the taking.
The derivative house of cards is unraveling. The ring of TBTF banks are camouflaging their interconnected insolvency through the myth of bilateral netting. The unmarked-to-market losses of these banks exceed their net worths, yet JP Morgan and financial media pundits continue to downplay the revelation of the company's losses relative to its "earnings" and "solid" balance sheet. The Wall Street Journal's reporting has been so adolescent that one must assume it is playing the role of Fed propagandist. Only on the internet is there informed analysis of the import of JP Morgan's loss.
You have been reading much about the bank's 'Chief Investment Office' and its role in hedging JPM's aggregate risk exposure. In fact the office is Derivative Central of the world's financial rot and it doesn't hedge anything; its positions are simply not hedge-able. Derivative fraud is thoroughly embedded in our financial system. The exposure of vulnerabilities is only now beginning and as it unravels it will make sub-prime, securitized debt fraud and other sundry schemes seem trivial.
The Fed will never allow these banks to hemorrhage and will as surreptitiously as possible absorb their losses onto its own balance sheet. But doing so will require the creation of mountains of currency and inevitably, a revaluation of dollars as measured in gold.
Regarding gold and silver...
The contrarian in me loves this: NYPost: Laying a golden egg, particularly the expressed disdain -- "He would have been up 4 percent in the first quarter if it weren’t for the goddamned gold.” This is precisely the 'wall of worry' bull markets are made of.
Kudos to David Einhorn of hedge fund Greenlight Capital, who in a letter yesterday to his partners adroitly confronted the absurdity of Warren Buffet and Charles Mungers' vacuous assault on gold and gold-holders:
" The debate around currencies, cash, and cash equivalents continues. Over the last few years, we have come to doubt whether cash will serve as a good store of value. If you wrapped up all the $100 bills in circulation, it would form a cube about 74 feet per side. If you stacked the money seven feet high, you could store it in a warehouse roughly the size of a football field. The value of all that cash would be about a trillion dollars. In a hundred years, that money will have produced nothing. In a thousand years, it is likely that the cash will either be worthless or worth very little. It will not pay you interest or dividends and it won’t grow earnings, though you could burn it for heat. You’d have to pay someone to guard it. You could fondle the money. Alternatively, you could take every U.S. note in circulation, lay them end to end, and cover the entire 116 square miles of Omaha, Nebraska. Of course, if you managed to assemble all that money into your own private stash, the Federal Reserve could simply order more to be printed for the rest of us."
Chinese gold demand has doubled in the past 12 months and is now surpassing India as the world's largest gold consumer. In the face of lower prices China is sucking up unprecedented physical tonnage. In the last year Chinese gold imports from Hong Kong have increased 800%; in March alone it imported 64 tons. Contrast this to the paper price making occurring on the Comex and LBMA and you must conclude that something is amiss. There are parallel paper and physical gold markets and buyers in the physical continue to benefit from the gift of false price discovery being set -- for now -- on the paper exchanges in New York and London. The thinking investor has benefited greatly by arbitraging this anomaly, profiting every year since 2000 from successively higher annual prices. Physical demand, price suppression, structural economic meltdown and OTC derivative rot is decreasing the influence of the paper market pricing. The stars have never been more firmly aligned for dramatically higher gold prices.
All the best,
Jeff



